We operate offshore wind service vessels and are commissioning a new 34 m aluminium crew transfer vessel. We have an outline specification and a target class notation but no hull design.
We need a class-submittable naval architecture package — hull form, stability, scantlings and general arrangement — that will get through class plan approval without repeated resubmission.
| File | Type | Size | Access |
|---|---|---|---|
| Outline vessel specification | 6 MB | NDA required | |
| Operability & motion criteria | 3 MB | NDA required | |
| Turbine access system interface drawing | DWG | 9 MB | NDA required |
| Target class notation & rule set | 22 MB | Public |
A milestone is accepted and paid when these are demonstrably met — not when it is merely submitted.
Submitted proposals are normalised into the same axes so they can actually be compared. The platform does not choose for the client — it makes the technical comparison transparent.
Lowest price is not automatically ranked first. Price sits alongside methodology, assumptions, verification and availability, because the cheapest proposal against an incomplete methodology is not the cheapest project.
Each match shows the evidence behind the score — and states what is missing rather than hiding it behind a rank.
We need a class-submittable naval architecture package — hull form, stability, scantlings and general arrangement — that will get through class plan approval without repeated resubmission.
We need a class-submittable naval architecture package — hull form, stability, scantlings and general arrangement — that will get through class plan approval without repeated resubmission.
We need a class-submittable naval architecture package — hull form, stability, scantlings and general arrangement — that will get through class plan approval without repeated resubmission.
We need the full structural design package — analysis, member sizing, detailing and calculation report — produced to a standard our local reviewing engineer can check and sign without redoing the work.