We are developing a 14-turbine onshore wind farm. Site investigation across all positions is complete and shows highly variable ground — weathered rock at three positions and soft alluvium at four.
We need position-specific foundation designs that handle the ground variability without over-designing the good positions, plus a clear basis a lender's engineer can review.
| File | Type | Size | Access |
|---|---|---|---|
| Site investigation report (all positions) | 64 MB | Released to invited engineers | |
| Turbine loads & stiffness requirement | 8 MB | NDA required | |
| Topographic survey | DWG | 38 MB | Released to invited engineers |
| Access constraints memo | 2 MB | Released to invited engineers |
A milestone is accepted and paid when these are demonstrably met — not when it is merely submitted.
Submitted proposals are normalised into the same axes so they can actually be compared. The platform does not choose for the client — it makes the technical comparison transparent.
Lowest price is not automatically ranked first. Price sits alongside methodology, assumptions, verification and availability, because the cheapest proposal against an incomplete methodology is not the cheapest project.
Each match shows the evidence behind the score — and states what is missing rather than hiding it behind a rank.
We need position-specific foundation designs that handle the ground variability without over-designing the good positions, plus a clear basis a lender's engineer can review.
We need position-specific foundation designs that handle the ground variability without over-designing the good positions, plus a clear basis a lender's engineer can review.
We need position-specific foundation designs that handle the ground variability without over-designing the good positions, plus a clear basis a lender's engineer can review.
We need the full structural design package — analysis, member sizing, detailing and calculation report — produced to a standard our local reviewing engineer can check and sign without redoing the work.